Report has it that a church in California is still having a disagreement with government officials from Santa Clara County. The church has been fined $1.2 million because they didn’t follow the rules during the COVID-19 pandemic. The church is saying that the county did things that were against the Constitution. They used phones to watch the people who go to the church and were on the church’s property.
The church took the government to court, and they filed a complaint in the United States District Court. They said that the county and a company from Denver called SafeGraph did things that invaded people’s privacy. They used a method called geofencing, which is like a virtual fence, to watch and track people in the county without permission.
“Our church believes in the rights and privacy of all our members,” Pastor McClure said in a statement to CBN News. “We are not just standing up for the rights of our church family; we are standing up for the rights of religious people across this country.”
The complaint alleges the county and the company violated the Fourth Amendment protecting individuals’ privacy, as well as the free exercise and establishment clauses of the First Amendment. It also accuses the county of seeking “to punish Calvary for exercising their religious rights in violation of the county’s draconian orders,” according to Bloomberg Law.
“Geofencing is a location-based tool used by the government to track individuals through their cell phone data. This tool is generally used in police investigations of criminal activity and requires the government to obtain a warrant, which is limited by time and scope,” according to court documents.
The defendants are accused of targeting Calvary Chapel by using the geofencing tool without a warrant in an effort to obtain information in their ongoing state enforcement action against the church. Private businesses and other venues in the county were not spied on during the pandemic, court documents explained.
“At the behest of the county, SafeGraph put two geofences around CCSJ and surveilled the churchgoers within the church premises for over a year during the COVID-19 pandemic,” the lawsuit said.
“This operation took place over a year with seemingly no oversight, boundaries, or limitations, meaning defendants could track churchgoers in the sanctuary, prayer room, or bathroom,” the complaint said.
In the lawsuit, Calvary alleges, “This type of expansive geofencing operation is not only an invasion of privacy but represents a terrifying precedent if allowed to go unaddressed. As it stands, defendants assert that, as long as they call it research, any level of government can target and spy on any individual or group at any time for any duration. The government can then wield any collected data against said individuals or groups who oppose their orders.”
“This is not just un-American; it is downright Orwellian,” the complaint added.
Former County Counsel James Williams, who is now a county executive, previously defended the county’s use of geofencing, as the Mercury News reported in March. He maintained, however, that the county did not track individuals’ cell phones at the church.
“Tracking congregants in and out of church is something we would expect in China. The fact that county officials would use these tactics should be a wakeup call to every American who values their own freedom to worship, speak, or attend gatherings of any ideological nature,” Robert Tyler, president of Advocates for Faith and Freedom, said in a statement to CBN News. “Failure to embrace the regime in charge will ruin your social credit score.
Mariah Gondeiro, the church’s attorney, called the county’s actions “an invasion of privacy” and “represent a terrifying precedent” for Christians in America.
“People of faith should never have to worry about the government spying on them in places of worship,” Gondeiro said.
CBN News reached out to the Santa Clara County Counsel’s Office and to SafeGraph for comment. The county replied, saying, “The allegations in the complaint are false, and we are confident the county will prevail in court. To be clear, the county did not use cell phone surveillance to track anyone at Calvary Chapel during the pandemic. The allegations take out of context an analysis of third-party, commercially available aggregate data that was used to respond to Calvary’s own allegations in a lawsuit that Calvary itself filed.”
Meanwhile, on Aug. 14, California’s 6th District Court of Appeals handed down its decision, rejecting $200,000 in COVID fines against Calvary Chapel and its pastors.
The church had been fined in 2020 and 2021 for violating state and county limits for indoor gatherings.
The appeals court reversed those lower court decisions, citing a U.S. Supreme Court ruling during the pandemic that determined a ban by Gov. Gavin Newsom on indoor worship services violated freedom of religion, according to KNTV.
For almost three years, the Calvary Chapel and Santa Clara County have fought legal battles in local, state, and federal courts over the fines.
Last April, a county judge ordered the church to pay $1.2 million in fines for the period from November 2020 to June 2021 when the church was not following the county’s mask policy, according to the Mercury News.
However, Calvary has said it will appeal that ruling.
Source : CBN News
